Why 95% of AI Projects Fail, and How To Prevent It From Happening to You

Written By Nic Bowman

By Nic Bowman. As the CEO of a group of amazingly talented senior technical software developers with over a decade in the trenches of enterprise systems, I've seen my share of technology rollouts that promised the earth and delivered an atlas. From the early days of cloud migrations, to low code custom builds, to the more recent scramble for artificial intelligence (AI) and AI agents, one pattern emerges time and again: the gap between ambition and execution. 

Today, that gap yawns wider still. Recent reports paint a sobering picture – a 95 per cent failure rate for generative AI pilots in enterprises, with 42 per cent of organisations scrapping most of their initiatives this year alone. Unfortunately, these are not the exception to the rule; rather they're the aggregate of billions of dollars of investment evaporating into thin air.


Skip ahead: Get a custom-built AI solution that delivers on promises

The Numbers Don’t Lie

Okay, we are going to jump straight into the numbers here, so stick with me. There is a lot of data available on AI project deployment that is starting to emerge. It is as useful as a splash of cold water on your face in the mornings, and as eye-opening. For many companies, it is time to wake up and smell the coffee. As I like to say, AI is not a magic wand, unless it is wielded by those with a solid technical and software development foundation.

When it comes to hype vs. numbers, the numbers win.

  • 95%. The MIT Media Lab's The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025 report, released in July, crystallised the current state of malaise. Despite an estimated $30–40 billion poured into generative AI by enterprises, a staggering 95 per cent of these pilots yielded no measurable business return. Often not because the models are broken, but because their integration is flawed. The hemorrhaging continues.

So this hasn’t got a number, but it is a significant finding: the RAND Corporation landmark report underscores that AI projects often fail not because of poor algorithms, but because of misalignment in process, organisational structure, and expectations. 


There’s hope. Explore Trusted Ways to Use AI in Business

The Anatomy of AI Failure

To understand why AI projects are buckling under their own weight, we must first dissect the common pitfalls. The reports converging on 2025's landscape reveal a taxonomy of errors, each rooted in a misunderstanding of what AI demands from an organisation. Let's break them down.

Serious Data Quality Issues

First, data quality – or the lack thereof – stands as the most cited culprit. AI thrives on fuel, and that fuel is data. Yet, as Gartner's third-quarter 2024 survey of 248 data management leaders revealed, 63 per cent of organisations either lack or are uncertain about having AI-ready data practices. Traditional data management suffices for reporting dashboards or basic analytics, but AI requires datasets that are not just clean but contextual, unbiased, and continuously refreshed. Poor quality data leads to models that underperform or, worse, perpetuate errors at scale.

Consider the Informatica analysis from earlier this year: most AI failures trace back to data silos, incomplete records, or drift – where real-world inputs evolve beyond the training set. As the LexisNexis report on AI obstacles notes, this issue compounds with complexity: the more intricate the project, the more likely data inconsistencies derail it.

ai projects integration

Integration Challenges

Integration challenges follow closely. MIT's research highlights that the astonishingly high percentage of failures stems from "flawed enterprise integration," where off-the-shelf tools like ChatGPT are bolted onto legacy systems without thought to workflows. 


Related: Streamlining Workflow Automation: Trends and Strategies

Enterprises often treat AI as a plug-and-play module, ignoring the bespoke plumbing required. A Forbes deep-dive into the MIT findings on AI points to cultural friction here: IT teams fret over performance risks, while HR grapples with adoption barriers. The result? Shadow AI proliferates, unsanctioned tools creep in via individual users, and any and all central strategies are eroded. 

What about Governance Gaps?

Governance gaps exacerbate these issues. AI isn't static; it's probabilistic, prone to hallucinations or biases that demand oversight.

Yet, the RAND report identifies insufficient governance as a primary failure mode, with projects collapsing under compliance risks or ethical lapses. 

In regulated sectors like finance or healthcare, this is acute: the EU AI Act's "high-risk" classifications, rolled out mid-2025, have caught many off-guard, requiring audits that small teams simply can't handle.

Even in less stringent environments, the absence of clear accountability leads to scope creep or abandoned pilots.

Skills shortages round out the quartet. PMI's 2024 blog on AI missteps estimates 70–80 per cent failure rates partly due to a dearth of expertise – not just in prompting models, but in bridging AI with domain knowledge.

Business leaders grasp the "what," but falter on the "how."

The MIT report notes that only 33% of internal AI builds succeed, versus 67% when external partners are used.

View AI deployment success story: AI and Digital Innovation: The Driving Forces Behind TTT Financial Group’s Industry Leadership

Unrealistic Expectations

Finally, unrealistic expectations cap the list. The LinkedIn analysis by David Linthicum captures it well: underfunding persists because of the myth that AI slashes costs overnight, which leads to starved projects. Chasing trends – be it the latest LLM or agentic systems – without tied objectives invites disillusionment. As one Reddit thread on the 95 per cent stat quipped, it's often a misalignment between hype and reality.

These aren't exhaustive, but they form a clear pattern: AI failures aren't technological defeats; they're organisational ones. The technology performs as promised when the groundwork is laid.

Learn from our experts here: Explaining Microsoft Copilot as a Strategic AI Advantage for Your Business


The Fundamentals That Matter for Successful AI Projects

Ok, so what now. We see the stats, we see the failures. Should we just stop trying? No - we learn. At riivo, we've internalised this lesson through years of building digital transformation solutions with AI-augmented platforms for knowledge-intensive sectors. 

AI, in our view, isn't a silver bullet; it's an amplifier for what already works. To harness it effectively, organisations must prioritise three pillars: a comprehensive knowledge base, robust processes, and rigorous governance.

Explore: UI for AI: The Smartest Move is Leveraging What You Already Have

Knowledge is King

Start with the knowledge base. Your knowledge base is a living repository of domain-specific insights, structured to feed AI models accurately. In practice, this means curating data not just for volume but for relevance – tagged, versioned, and enriched with metadata. Our approach exemplifies this: our centralised knowledge graph integrates unstructured content from documents, emails, and databases into a queryable asset. When we layer AI on top – say, for semantic search or recommendation engines – the models draw from a foundation that's already vetted and contextualised.

This contrasts sharply with the scattershot data practices dooming most pilots. A well-maintained knowledge base mitigates bias and drift, ensuring outputs align with organisational reality.

Streamline Workflow Processes

Processes come next – the unglamorous glue that turns AI from experiment to operation. Here, riivo emphasises modular, iterative workflows over big-bang implementations. We draw from agile principles honed in software dev, and we are experts at process automation which requires streamlining existing processes. 

Our success stems from process mapping sessions early in engagements. We dissect current states, identify AI touchpoints, and prototype in sandboxes. Metrics are baked in from day one to track not just accuracy but adoption and throughput. As the Forbes piece on MIT's findings advises, decentralising authority while maintaining accountability – letting front-line teams shape adoption – boosts success rates. 

We operationalise this via cross-functional squads, blending devs, ops, and business leads.

Get Good Governance

Governance, though, is the linchpin. Without it, even the best knowledge and processes unravel. Riivo's framework mandates ethical reviews, audit trails, and rollback mechanisms for every AI component. We align with standards like ISO 42001 for AI management, so that compliance isn't bolted on but woven in. This includes bias audits using tools and continuous monitoring via dashboards that flag anomalies.

Engage with External Experts

With only a small portion of internal AI projects succeeding, and double that when external partners are brought in, it follows that this is a critical step in successful AI project deployment. Look for a digital transformation company with a solid foundation in software development and business best practice. 

Chart a Pragmatic Path Forward

As we close out 2025, the AI landscape feels like a crossroads. The failure stats – 95 per cent, 80 per cent, 42 per cent – are calls to recalibrate. At riivo, we’ve seen firsthand how a solid knowledge base illuminates blind spots, how refined processes smooth adoption, and how governance instils confidence.

For leaders eyeing AI, my advice is simple: audit your foundations before you build. Partner with those who do this on a daily basis - successfully - and remember: technology serves strategy, not the other way round.

Talk to the experts at riivo.

FAQs

Why does the AI project fail?

At riivo, we've observed that AI projects often fail due to inadequate data quality, where incomplete or siloed datasets lead to unreliable model outputs and stalled integrations. Additionally, a lack of clear processes and governance can result in scope creep, compliance issues, and poor alignment with business objectives, amplifying existing organisational weaknesses. Without these fundamentals in place, even advanced AI tools struggle to deliver value. Speak to our experts at riivo to ensure your AI initiatives are built on a solid foundation.

What are the 5 stages of the AI project?

At riivo, we structure AI projects into five key stages: Discovery, where business needs and data readiness are assessed; Data Preparation, focusing on curating a high-quality, contextual knowledge base; Model Development, building and testing tailored AI solutions; Integration, embedding AI into existing workflows with clear processes; and Monitoring & Iteration, ensuring ongoing performance through governance and continuous refinement. This methodical approach mitigates risks and drives measurable outcomes. Speak to our experts at riivo to guide your AI project through these critical stages.

What is the biggest downfall to AI?

In our view at riivo, the biggest downfall to AI is over-reliance on the technology without addressing foundational elements like data management and organisational readiness, leading to amplified inefficiencies and failed implementations. This often stems from hype overshadowing the need for structured knowledge bases and governance, resulting in projects that don't scale or adapt effectively. True impact comes from treating AI as an enhancer to well-established systems. Speak to our experts at riivo to unlock AI's potential with proven fundamentals

What does AI need to succeed?

AI success, as we’ve proven at riivo, hinges on a robust knowledge base with clean, relevant data, streamlined processes that align with business workflows, and rigorous governance to ensure compliance and accountability. With evidence that shows 67% success when external partners are used, speak to the experts at riivo to build a solid foundation for your next AI initiatives.

Nic Bowman
Next

Vibe Coding Without Regrets: Bubble vs Lovable vs Power Platform (What to Use, When, Why)